LedgerX to Begin Trading Cryptocurrency Derivatives

Post Reply
Administrator
Site Admin
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 4:19 pm

Sun Nov 19, 2017 10:25 am

For the first time ever, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has given permission to a private company to exchange and clear any number of cryptocurrency derivatives.

After three years of work, New York-based startup LedgerX was today granted a rare derivatives clearing organization (DCO) license allowing it to clear and custody financial instruments backed by bitcoin, ether and any number of blockchain-based cryptocurrencies.

The instruments, designed to mitigate investment risk, are the latest signal that the cryptocurrency markets are maturing, with the total value of the asset class crossing $115bn earlier this year.

But the guidance from the agency in charge of ensuring the integrity of all futures and swaps markets in the US could have bigger implications than just letting a single company finally open for business.

LedgerX co-founder and CEO Paul Chou told CoinDesk:
"It means a lot, not just for the industry, but globally, because the CFTC will set the example of what a well-licensed clearinghouse and exchange based around digital currencies will look like."
Beyond bitcoin

Though frequently described as a bitcoin exchange and clearinghouse, LedgerX's license did not require an overly broad definition of cryptocurrency. Rather, the permission is open to any of a series of instruments derived from the cryptographic primitives used to build a number of protocols.

Similar to how G5 currencies are typically viewed as safe investments due to their relative stability, Chou imagines three to five cryptocurrencies will be deemed "viable" candidates for the exchange and clearinghouse, based on market capitalization and functionality.

Initial coin offering (ICO) tokens sold to raise funds will not likely be considered for inclusion on LedgerX, given their gray area between CFTC-regulated commodities and SEC regulated securities.

Rather than having to reapply for each currency and each derivative contract, LedgerX will "self-certify" that the new opportunity is compliant.

"Instead of evaluating different governments," as with the case of a G5 currency, said Chou, "you’ll be evaluating different technologies or approaches underneath these digital currencies."

Global implications

The CFTC decision comes at a time when many in the cryptocurrency industry have been anxiously awaiting clear guidance — including other regulators.

In March, another lengthy cryptocurrency regulatory application was refused by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), citing among other things, a lack of "surveillance-sharing agreements," and a requirement that "markets must be regulated."

Currently under review by the SEC, the application would let Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss list a bitcoin-tied exchange-traded fund (ETF) on the BATS BTX Excahnge.

Given LedgerX's lengthy requirements to report on its customers and the regulatory body's history of co-regulating certain instruments, Chou believes today's decision could provide just the answer the SEC and other agencies in Asia and Europe have been waiting for.

"I think the CFTC will set an example both for other regulators here in the U.S., but also globally as well," he said.

Three-year battle

After years of working and waiting, progress had been moving swiftly leading up to today's news.

It was just earlier this month that the CFTC formally registered LedgerX as a swap execution facility (SEF) after operating with a temporary license for about two years, making the New York-based firm only the second cryptocurrency outfit to be regulated under the provision.

A close observer of the developing story might have even found a clue back in May, when LedgerX announced it had raised an $11.4 million Series B led by Miami International Holdings and Huiyin Blockchain Venture Investments.

It turns out, the money for the startup that had already raised a $1.5 million seed round and an undisclosed Series A was intended to meet capital requirements implemented by the Dodd-Frank Act. In order to ensure agreements can be fulfilled in case of an emergency, the act requires that a DCO hold operating costs to run its business for a year.
User avatar
MCXTIPS
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2017 1:46 pm

Sun Nov 19, 2017 10:35 am

Well it looks like the big financial institutions are getting involved in cryptocurrencies. Must be time to regulate these suckers! This just goes to show that whenever there is money involved, crooks will attempt to grab a piece of the action for themselves, which is exactly why investors need a financial services regulator to ensure honesty and fair dealing for all in all financial instruments including cryptocurrencies. All wrong headed right wing politicians who are antiregulation, please take note. It is their typical antiregulation philosopy which ensures coming future disasters like this will reoccur repeatedly in the future. Caveat Emptor!
hetu
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2017 8:33 pm

Sun Nov 19, 2017 10:37 am

They can trade all the derivatives they want, but they will still have to own BTC if they want to move the price since they can't naked short it AND they are competing with a world population for ownership. 24/7 trading means the competition is always ready to buy the dips. Unlike stocks, a lot of people keep their BTC off line and off the books. BTC isn't held in the brokers name, so they can't loan it for selling.
Post Reply